LinuxWorld
Subscribe to this site with RSS

Circumventing Microsoft

Notwithstanding the fact it will be many years before very many corporate users might be able to work in a "Microsoft-free" environment, there appears to be significant effort being put forth to make it a reality. From the geekiest tech pubs, like the Java Developer's Journal to august ones such as The Wall Street Journal, circumventing Microsoft is a hot topic.

I choose "circumvention" deliberately, as many of the strategies intend not so much to eliminate Microsoft from the equation but to limit our dependence on Microsoft and limit the payments users make to same.

Some circumvention techniques are endorsed - and even sold - by Microsoft, whereas others are completely outside of its control.

In the former category, we find both "terminal services" and "virtual PC" technologies. Microsoft sells terminal services licenses directly and indirectly via its agreements with Citrix Systems. Virtual PC (and virtual server) technologies are sold in Microsoft boxes.

With terminal services, clients running on non-Windows operating systems - including Linux, Macintosh, Java and Solaris - can run native Windows applications remotely (and efficiently) using thin-client technology. While it doesn't eliminate Windows (and you have to be online to use it), it provides for client-side flexibility.

Where one needs to have full Windows available locally, virtual PC technology can be had from Microsoft or EMC's VMware division. With this approach, one can load and boot one or more Windows systems running "virtually" on "top" of a base operating system - usually Windows, Linux or Macintosh - that actually controls the hardware.

Again, while one ends up paying Microsoft for both the virtualization software and an operating system license, one gains the flexibility of using a different base operating system, thus circumventing Microsoft's stranglehold on your desktop.

The rise of the browser as the ubiquitous client portal has already loosened Microsoft's grip on the desktop. After all, if I use applications like Salesforce.com (and myriad others) that are built with the browser, I can get my job done from any browser-enabled computer - which is to say any computer.

React: Give us your thoughts on the issues here.
Use this form to start a public discussion with other Linux World users on this article.
Log In | Register for an account (Why you should)

Note: Register to have your user name appear; otherwise your comment will show up as "Anonymous."

*Anonymous comments will only appear once they are approved by the moderator.

Newsletter sign-up

Sign up for one of Network World's newsletters compliments of Linux World

Linux & Open Source News Alert
Web Applications Alert
Video & Podcast Alert
Security: Threat  Alert
Virtualization Alert

Email Address: